Discharge under Section 239 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
The general process of law is that after the police on completing its investigation, files the final charge sheet against the accused.
Thereafter the accused is put to trial for framing of charges against him, by the concerned Court. However there lies a provision under Code of Criminal Procedure that the Accused person can be discharged before the charges are framed against him.
This provision can be resorted to by the Accused provided some certain criteria are satisfied.
The Applicable Law
Section 239, Crpc when accused shall be discharged. - (1) If, upon considering the police report and the documents sent with it under Section 173 and making such examination, if any, of the accused as the Magistrate thinks necessary and after giving the prosecution and the accused an opportunity of being heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the accused, and record his reasons for so doing.
Ingredients for Discharge
The Court will have to consider the Police Report and the Charge sheet (F.I.R and Final Case Report) as submitted to it by the Police under Section 173.
- The Magistrate may examine the Accused if he deems fit.
- Thereafter both the Prosecution and the Accused Parties versions would be heard
- Charge against the accused to be groundless- There should not be in existence an iota of evidence against the accused. The Court also has to satisfy itself that there is no prima facie (on the face of it) case against the accused.
- Then the Accused shall be discharged.
Applicability of DischargeDischarge as under Section 239 Crpc is applicable to Warrant Cases (Cases of a serious nature):
- Practically it is observed, most often than not, the Charge sheet/Final Report as filed by the Police can be assailed in the Courts.
- The foremost principal to be observed that when the Police files the Final Charge sheet , often the material particulars pertaining to the offences alleged are missing.
- The accusation leveled in the Charge sheet is simply for instance: Accused charged under Section 120 B/420/467 of the Indian Penal Code.
- The Courts have unanimously held that in such circumstances as the Police have failed to state details as to how the offence was committed i.e. material particulars of the offence; the Accused is liable to be discharged.
Explaining further, the example as above, it is common knowledge that Section 120 B of the IPC deals with Criminal Conspiracy, Section 420 deals with Cheating and Section 467 deals with Forgery.
Thus if the vital elements of the crime such as common intent in Criminal Conspiracy; Dishonest intention in Cheating; Wrongful Economic gain in Forgery are not made out in the Charge sheet , then the Court is liable to discharge the Accused as no prima facie case is made out.
Thus it is on the above premises, the Accused can be discharged.
Documents perused by the Court
It is further pertinent to mention that at the stage of framing of charges, the prosecution evidence does not commence, therefore the Magistrate has to generally consider the materials as placed before it by the Investigating Police Officer.
To put it differently, if the court were to think that the accused might have committed the offence it can frame the charge, though for conviction the conclusion is required to be that the accused has committed the offence. It is apparent that at the stage of framing of a charge, probative value of the materials on record cannot be gone into; the materials brought on record by the prosecution have to be accepted as true at that stage." The crystallized judicial view is that the Court cannot conduct a deep roving enquiry into the evidence at this stage.
Thus the Complainants allegations + Witnesses Statements + Charge sheet as prepared during investigation are the materials to be considered by the Court
Contents in an Application For Discharge under Section 239 C.R.P.C
The following points must be raised in the Application:
- Depending upon the nature of the offence, it has to be asserted
- That no material particulars of the offence have been specified in the F.I.R and Charge sheet i.e Vagueness in allegations in F.I.R and Charge sheet.
- That the F.I.R and Charge sheet allegations have not been supported by evidence.
- That the version of the Prosecution has not been supported by any of the witnesses for the Prosecution
- Contradictions present in the versions of the Prosecution and Witnesses.
- That the allegations in the charge sheet are new and different from complaint allegations and these new allegations were not communicated to the accused to defend by the accused by producing supporting evidence.
A question may crop up as to what exactly constitutes a prima-facie case. The Courts have reiterated that there must no be a single shred of evidence against the Accused. However the Courts have also held that in the event a suspicion arises against the Accused, still he would be discharged provided the suspicion is not a grave suspicion.
In the words of the Honble Kerala High Court The law does contemplate a situation, though it must be rare, where an indictment on the basis of a final report may be groundless.
In such circumstances, the court provides the safety valve provision in Section 239/240 C.r.P.C where under premature discharge can be claimed by such indictees.