- Legal Research
- Find a Lawyer
- Hall of Fame
- Professional Services
- Legal Consultation
- Legal Help
The Union Cabinet approved of the draft Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill 2013 and it shall now be codified into an Act. The purpose of this Bill is to regulate the otherwise unregulated Real Estate Sector which is one of the largest sectors in India and has been requiring regulation from the Government for a long time. The Builders and Developers lobby have on the whole not really welcomed the bill and understandably so , as it curbs the monopolistic business practices and gives more rights and freedom to the purchaser.
The Builder/Developer referred to as Promoter in the Bill shall now be required to register the project (each phase of a project shall be considered as a single entity) which it intends to develop on an immovable property in a prescribed format and only upon receiving the approval and certificate of registration can the Promoter advertise and invite public to make bookings in the Project. The said certificate of registration granted by the Regulatory Authority shall be valid for the period of completion of project as declared by the Promoter and shall be given an extension of upto one year and not exceeding two years. In case if the project remains to be completed after such extensions expire, then in that case the remaining development work shall be carried out by the Competent Authority, body of Allottees or in any manner so decided.
However, such registration shall not be required in cases where the area of development is less than 4000 sqmtrs or is in an area notified by the Central or the State Government. It shall also not be applicable to Promoter who had sought all necessary approvals and permissions a year prior to the commencement of the Act. Any repair/ renovation which does not require remarketing of the project has also been kept out of the ambit of such registrations.
The Bill has laid down some stringent rules in cases of default by the Promoters. The registration so granted shall be revoked on various grounds including wilful default by Promoter, unfair practices of misrepresentations and violation of terms of agreement with the Competent Authority. The Promoter shall also be debarred by the Competent Authority and the list of such debarred Promoters shall be available on the website of the Competent Authority.
The Promoter shall not collect any amounts from the Allottees towards booking of the properties till the Agreement for Sale is entered into. The Promoter would be required to sign an undertaking stating therein that he has title in the land, it is free from all encumbrances, timelines for the project shall be adhered to, setting out the time line and that the Promoter shall be obliged to deposit 70% of the amount realised from the Allottees from time to time in a separate account to be maintained in a scheduled Bank within 15 days of its realization and utilize the same for that project only. The Promoters shall therefore not be able to circulate their monies for completion of their other projects thus ensuring timely completion of the projects. The Promoter shall be required to decare its list of Real Estate Agents as well.
If for any reason the Promoter/builder is unable to complete the project, it shall be liable to refund the amounts to the Allottees alongwith interest in terms of clause 15 (2) of the Bill and penalty if any as imposed by the Competent Authority. This shall however be without prejudice to its right to other remedies. That upon completion of the project and after obtaining completion certificate or occupation certificate as the case may be the Promoter shall handover the maintenance of the building/plot to the Allottees. The original title certificates and the building plans shall also be handed over to the association of the Allottees. If within a year of handing over of the property there are any structural defects or deficiencies noticed , the Promoter shall be obliged to rectify the same without further charge and within a reasonable time. In case of failure to do the same the Allottees shall be entitled to compensation/damages as may be determined by the Competent Authority.
The Authority may upon a complaint made or on a suo moto complaint summon the Promoter, Allottee or any person connected with such complaint and seek explanation in regard to the complaint so made. While doing so the Authority shall have the same powers as a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The authority shall also have the power to execute the orders passed by it in case the party fails to comply.
There is no specific format prescribed under the Bill for making complaints before the Authority however it has been provided that the Authority shall on a later date prescribe the format , fee etc for complaints, applications etc.
Having been bestowed with the powers of a Civil Court the Legislative has exclude the Civil Courts from interfering in such matters unless there is a specific reference from the Authorities itself.
In case of a Company all persons responsible for the day to day activities of the Company and in-charge of the affairs of the Company shall be prosecuted unless he is able to prove that the default was not within his knowledge. The Court before which the case is being prosecuted shall have the power to compound the offence.
The aforementioned rules, regulations procedures and proceedings as set out in the draft Bill available in the public domain shall be codified by the Legislature and enacted in all the States and it shall then be the responsibility of the State to regulate the Real Estate Sector and prevent malpractices of the Builders/Promoters. The ACT which shall come into being soon shall bring more clarity with regard to the various forms, formats, applications, fees for applying for various approvals by the Promoters, formats for filing complaints before the Regulatory Authority and appeal before the Appellate Authority, and rules relating to the exercise of power by the Regulatory Authorities in States and the Appellate Tribunal. The enactment of the Bill is most awaited by the promoters and investors as only thereafter would it be clear whether the attempt to regulate the Real Estate Sector has a positive or a negative impact on the real estate market.
Sudha Mishra vs. Surya Chandra Mishra( R.F.A 299 of 2014
The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in Sudha Mishra vs. Surya Chandra Mishra (R.F.A 299 of 2014)has ruled that a woman has a right over the property of her husband but she cannot claim a right to live in the house of her parents-in-law
The Lok Sabha or the lower house of Parliament passed the 122nd Constitutional Amendment (GST) Bill, which was earlier modified and passed by the Rajya Sabha.