Helplinelaw - legal solution world wide     Home | About Us | Contact Us
round round
Additional Executive Departments
Agriculture And Animals
Alcoholic Beverages
Business And Financial Institutions
Cities, Towns And Villages
Civil Procedure And Limitations
Codes And Standards
Conduct Of Public Business
Conservation, Resources And Development
Contracts And Contractual Relations
Corporations, Associations And Partnerships
Correctional And Penal Institutions
County, Township And Political Subdivision Government
Courts
Crimes And Punishment; Peace Officers And Public Defenders
Criminal Procedure
Debtor-creditor Relations
Domestic Relations
Education And Libraries
Evidence And Legal Advertisements
Executive Branch
Incorporation And Regulation Of Certain Utilities And Carriers
Juries
Labor And Industrial Relations
Lands, Levees, Drainage, Sewers And Public Water Supply
Laws And Statutes
Legislative Branch
Military Affairs And Police
Motor Vehicles, Watercraft And Aviation
Occupations And Professions
Ownership And Conveyance Of Property
Public Health And Welfare
Public Officers And Employees, Bonds And Records
Public Safety And Morals
Roads And Waterways
Sovereignty, Jurisdiction And Emblems
Statutory Actions And Torts
Suffrage And Elections
Taxation And Revenue
Trade And Commerce
Trusts And Estates Of Decedents And Persons Under Disability
articles
constitution
search a lawyer
Country:
City:
ACTS, STATUTES
letterboxSubmit Article
loginArticle Login
 
lawyer
Find a Lawyer :
Country :
City :
Category :
 
Home > Statutes > Usa Missouri
USA Statutes : missouri
Title : STATUTORY ACTIONS AND TORTS
Chapter : Chapter 524 Ejectment
An action for the recovery of the possession of premises may be
maintained in all cases where the plaintiff is legally entitled to the
possession thereof. (RSMo 1939 § 1529)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1365; 1919 § 1815; 1909 § 2382

(1971) Where neither the plaintiffs nor defendants were claiming title to
any lands of which the other had title and only issue was the location on
the ground of the boundary line between the two tracts, ejectment was the
proper remedy and it was error to decree title in plaintiff. Carroz v.
Kaminiski (Mo.), 467 S.W.2d 871.



An action for the recovery of the possession of land may also be
maintained against any person not having a better title thereto, in all
cases where the plaintiff claims possession thereof under or by virtue of:

(1) An entry or bounty land warrant location with the register and
receiver of any land office of the United States, or with the
commissioner of the general land office thereof; or

(2) An entry with the register and receiver of any land office in this
state; or

(3) A preemption right, under the laws of the United States, or of this
state; or

(4) A New Madrid location; or

(5) A confirmation made under the laws of the United States; or

(6) A land scrip location made in virtue of the laws of this state; or

(7) A French or Spanish grant, warrant or order of survey, surveyed by
proper authority, under the French or Spanish government, and recorded
according to the usages of the country prior to the tenth of March, 1804.
(RSMo 1939 § 1530)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1366; 1919 § 1816; 1909 § 2383

CROSS REFERENCE: New Madrid certificates and patents, evidentiary effect,
RSMo 446.250, 446.260



Two or more tenants in common may join in the action, and
jointly prosecute and sustain such action for the recovery of the estate
by them owned in common. (RSMo 1939 § 1531)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1367; 1919 § 1817; 1909 § 2384



The action shall be prosecuted in the real names of the parties
thereto, and shall be brought against the person in possession of the
premises claimed. (RSMo 1939 § 1532)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1368; 1919 § 1818; 1909 § 2385

CROSS REFERENCE: Holder under tax deed may sue for recovery of
possession, when, RSMo 140.580



The person from or through whom the defendant claims title to
the premises may, on motion, be made a codefendant. (RSMo 1939 § 1533)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1369; 1919 § 1819; 1909 § 2386

CROSS REFERENCE: Tenant served with summons in ejectment to notify
landlord, penalty, RSMo 441.090



It shall be sufficient for the plaintiff to aver in the petition
that on some day therein to be specified, he was entitled to the
possession of the premises, describing them, and being so entitled to the
possession thereof, that the defendant afterward, on some day to be
stated, entered into such premises, and unlawfully withholds from the
plaintiff the possession thereof, to his damage, in any sum he may claim.
(RSMo 1939 § 1534)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1370; 1919 § 1820; 1909 § 2387



All pleadings and proceedings in this action shall be conducted
as in other civil actions, except where it is herein otherwise
prescribed. (RSMo 1939 § 1535)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1371; 1919 § 1821; 1909 § 2388



To entitle the plaintiff to recover, it shall be sufficient for
him to show that, at the time of the commencement of the action, the
defendant was in possession of the premises claimed, and that the
plaintiff had such right to the possession thereof as is declared by this
chapter to be sufficient to maintain the action. (RSMo 1939 § 1536)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1372; 1919 § 1822; 1909 § 2389



If the action is brought by a joint tenant, or tenant in common,
against his cotenant, the plaintiff shall also be required to show on the
trial that the defendant actually ousted him, or did some act amounting
to a total denial of his right as such cotenant. (RSMo 1939 § 1537)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1373; 1919 § 1823; 1909 § 2390



Where there are two or more plaintiffs, any one or more may
recover any interest they may be entitled to, in the same manner as if
they had brought separate actions; and it shall not be any objection to a
recovery in such action that any one or several of the plaintiffs do not
prove any interest in the premises claimed, but those entitled shall have
judgment, according to their rights, for the whole or such part or
portion as they might have recovered if they had brought separate suits.
(RSMo 1939 § 1538)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1374; 1919 § 1824; 1909 § 2391



If the plaintiff prevail in the action, he shall recover damages
for all waste and injury, and, by way of damages, the rents and profits,
down to the time of assessing the same, or to the time of the expiration
of the plaintiff's title, under the following limitations:

(1) When it shall not be shown on the trial that the defendant had
knowledge of the plaintiff's claim prior to the commencement of the
action, such recovery shall be only from the time of the commencement of
the action;

(2) When it shall be shown on the trial that the defendant had knowledge
of the plaintiff's claim prior to the commencement of the action, and
that such knowledge came to the defendant within five years next
preceding the commencement of the action, such recovery shall be from the
time that such knowledge came to the defendant;

(3) When it shall be shown on the trial that knowledge of the plaintiff's
claim came to the defendant more than five years prior to the
commencement of the action, such recovery shall only be for the term of
five years next preceding the commencement of the action. (RSMo 1939 §
1541)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1377; 1919 § 1827; 1909 § 2394



If the right of the plaintiff to the possession of the premises
expire after the commencement of the suit, and before the trial, the
verdict shall be returned according to the fact, and judgment shall be
entered only for the damages and costs. (RSMo 1939 § 1542)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1378; 1919 § 1828; 1909 § 2395



If the plaintiff prevail in his action, and it appear in
evidence that the right of the plaintiff to the possession is unexpired,
the jury shall find the monthly value of the rents and profits. (RSMo
1939 § 1543)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1379; 1919 § 1829; 1909 § 2396



In such case the judgment shall be for the recovery of the
premises, the damages assessed and the accruing rents and profits, at the
rate found by the jury, from the time of rendering the verdict until the
possession of the premises is delivered to the plaintiff. (RSMo 1939 §
1544)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1380; 1919 § 1830; 1909 § 2397



No supersedeas shall be granted upon an appeal allowed in favor
of the defendant, unless the recognizance be in a sum and with security
sufficient to secure the payment of all damages and accruing rents and
profits, and with condition to stay waste, in addition to the conditions
now required by law in such cases. (RSMo 1939 § 1547, A. 1949 H.B. 2126)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1383; 1919 § 1833; 1909 § 2400



If a judgment or decree of dispossession shall be given in an
action for the recovery of possession of premises, or in any real action
in favor of a person having a better title thereto, against a person in
the possession, held by himself or by his tenant, of any lands, tenements
or hereditaments, such person may recover, in a court of competent
jurisdiction, compensation for all improvements made by him in good faith
on such lands, tenements or hereditaments, prior to his having had notice
of such adverse title. (RSMo 1939 § 1548)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1384; 1919 § 1834; 1909 § 2401

(1979) A claim under this section must fail if it can be shown the
improvements were made with notice to an adverse title. Morris v.
Ulbright (A.), 591 S.W.2d 245.



The plaintiff in his petition shall set forth the nature of his
title, the length of his possession and the kind and value of the
improvements made; and shall also aver therein that he entered into the
possession of the land, believing that he had good title thereto, and
that he made the improvements specified in the petition in good faith,
under the belief that he had good title to the land, and shall be
verified by his affidavit thereto annexed. (RSMo 1939 § 1549)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1385; 1919 § 1835; 1909 § 2402



An injunction may be granted to stay the plaintiff from taking
possession of the land until the value of the improvements is
ascertained, or until the further order of the court. (RSMo 1939 § 1550)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1386; 1919 § 1836; 1909 § 2403



The plaintiff may in his answer ask for leave to relinquish the
land to the occupying claimant, and to recover the value thereof, aside
from the improvements. (RSMo 1939 § 1551)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1387; 1919 § 1837; 1909 § 2404



If the value of the improvements exceed the value of the land
aside from the improvements, the court may order that the occupying
claimant shall, by a time to be specified in the order, take the land,
and pay the ascertained value thereof to the plaintiff, and in default of
such payment the plaintiff shall take possession of the land, discharged
from all claim of such occupying claimant. (RSMo 1939 § 1552)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1388; 1919 § 1838; 1909 § 2405



In all cases where the occupying claimant shall be adjudged to
take the land and pay the value thereof, the plaintiff shall, on payment
of the money, make to the occupying claimant a conveyance thereof, with
general warranty. (RSMo 1939 § 1553)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1389; 1919 § 1839; 1909 § 2406



If the value of the land, aside from the improvements, exceeds
the value of the improvements, the court may, in its discretion, order
either that the plaintiff shall pay for the improvements before he shall
be allowed to take possession of the land, or that the land shall be
divided between the occupying claimant and the plaintiff, according to
their respective rights. (RSMo 1939 § 1554)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1390; 1919 § 1840; 1909 § 2407



No partition shall be ordered or adjudged if the plaintiff
insist upon his right to retain the land. (RSMo 1939 § 1555)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1391; 1919 § 1841; 1909 § 2408



If the plaintiff shall give the occupying claimant notice, in
writing, of his claim, and of the nature thereof, such notice shall bar
the occupying claimant, and all persons claiming from or through him, of
compensation for improvements made after such notice. (RSMo 1939 § 1556)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1392; 1919 § 1842; 1909 § 2409



No occupying claimant shall recover compensation twice for his
improvements; and in all cases where the occupying claimant shall be paid
for his improvements by any person other than the proprietor of the
better title, such person shall be invested with the same rights, and
have the same remedy for the recovery thereof, as is given by this
chapter to such occupying claimant. (RSMo 1939 § 1557)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1393; 1919 § 1843; 1909 § 2410



When the judgment for the plaintiff is both for the recovery of
the possession and of damages, the plaintiff may have a writ of
possession, which shall command the officer to whom directed to deliver
to the plaintiff possession of the premises, and shall also command him
to levy and collect the damages and costs, as in executions on judgments
in other civil actions. (RSMo 1939 § 1545)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1381; 1919 § 1831; 1909 § 2398



When the judgment for the plaintiff is only for damages and
costs, execution may be had thereon, as on judgments in other civil
actions. (RSMo 1939 § 1546)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1382; 1919 § 1832; 1909 § 2399



Executions and writs for the delivery of possession of real
property shall issue to the sheriff of the county where the same, or some
part thereof, is situate, and shall be governed, in all respects, by the
rules governing executions in ordinary cases, so far as the same may be
applicable. (RSMo 1939 § 1559)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1395; 1919 § 1845; 1909 § 2412



An action for damages may be maintained in all the cases
enumerated in section 524.020. (RSMo 1939 § 1558)

Prior revisions: 1929 § 1394; 1919 § 1844; 1909 § 2411



 
round round
Usa-missouri Law Firm / Lawyers Services Provided in Usa-missouri :
Usa-missouri Divorce Laws, custody, Usa-missouri Corporate Lawyers, Agreement, provident fund, Registered marriage, Court marriage Lawyers, Special/ Foreign marriage, Incorporation of company, Rent, eviction, tenancy, Lease Lawyers, Usa-missouri Labour laws, Appeals, Supreme Court Lawyers, High Court Lawyers, Bail, medical, negligence, Insurance claims/ accidents Lawyer, Usa-missouri Citizenship/ immigration Lawyers, Copyright Laws, Consumer, district Lawyer, State, national, Dowry, Wills & Probate, Trust & Estates Lawyers, Intellectual Property Lawyer, Bankrupt Lawyers, Banking & Finance, Corporate, Private Business Law, Recovery, Joint Venture & Mergers, Consumer, Civil Right Law Usa-missouri, Medical Negligence, Medical Malpractice, legal notice, summons, Income Tax Lawyers, sales, Custom Law, Excise Law, octroi, cess Civil, Criminal Solicitor Usa-missouri, Registration of property, Title search, mutation relationship, Conveyance, Transfer of Property Law, Usa-missouri Property lawyer, deeds, drafts, power of attorney, Recovery, Taxation Laws in Usa-missouri
LEGAL SERVICES
Add Lawyer
Legal Enquiry
Find a Lawyer
Bare Acts / India Codes
Statutes / Code
LAWYER BY LOCATION
India Lawyer
United State Lawyer
UAE Lawyer
Canada Lawyer
Find More...
LAW PRACTICE AREA
Business Law
Employment & Labor Law
Govt. Agencis & Taxtion
Family Law
Real Estate Property Law
Immigration Law
ABOUT HELPLINELAW
About Us
Contact Us
Services
Site Map
Recommend to Friends
© copyright 2000-2010, Helplinelaw.com Terms of USE
This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Persons accessing this site are encouraged to seek independent counsel for advice in India abroad regarding their individual legal, civil criminal issues or consult one of the experts online.