The law on firearms in India is governed by the Indian Arms Act, 1959 which prescribes the relevant guidelines to possess guns. The aim behind this law is only to curb the menace of illegally keeping weapons which could possibly create threat of violence that might result from possessing them. This article looks at the laws which regulate gun laws in the country, when can an Indian civilian apply for a firearm and how different are the laws in India compared to other major countries.
In the middle 1800s with the increasing uprising of the British in India, regular episodes like poor pay, racial ruthlessness, increasing cultural indifference, poor terms of pensions, etc. were on the rise by the merciless British officers directly contributed to the discontent among the Indian soldiers. The sepoy mutiny of 1857 also known as the first battle of Independence was an after-math of the â€œgreased cartridgesâ€ which instigated the religious sentiments of both Hindu and Muslim Indian soldiers.
As a result of this revolt, the British were shook and under fear that similar rebellions in the future would eventually lead to the end of British Colonial era from India forever. Even though the rebellion was unsuccessful, it resulted in the illegal and unauthorised use of weapons like guns, rifles etc., resulting in the introduction of the Arms Act of 1878. This new law ensured that no Indian would be allowed to possess any weapon unless the Crown was convinced of his loyalty to the Crown. This law came to an end only after 12 years of independence in 1959.
Now, the law on firearms in India is governed by the Indian Arms Act, 1959 which prescribes the relevant guidelines to possess guns. The aim behind this law is only to curb the menace of illegally keeping weapons which could possibly create threat of violence that might result from possessing them. In addition to the Arms Act, there are Arms Rules, 1962 under which the manufacturing, selling, possessing, acquisition, import-export as well as transport of firearms and ammunition without a valid license is completely banned.
The 1959 law granted arbitrary use of powers to the licensing authorities. The 1959 Act was amplified by the Arms Rules of 1962 where both the laws completely prohibit the possession, sale, acquisition, manufacture, import, export and transfer of firearms without a valid license. Obtaining a valid arms license is a tedious process which ordinarily takes at least one year.
The Arms Act classifies firearms into 2 categories:
A bore is the thickness/ diameter of the bullet or in simple words, the hole in the middle of a barrel through which the bullet comes out.
An NPB weapon includes arms like handguns of calibre 0.35, 0.32, 0.22 and 0.380. Any individual can apply to obtain an NPB via the due procedure under Chapter- II and Chapter- III of the Arms Act of 1959. A PB weapon includes pistols (9 mm) and handguns of calibre 0.38, 0.455 and calibre 0.303 rifles. The same further includes semi- automatic and fully- automatic guns.
Prior to 2008 Mumbai attacks, only defence forces personnel and family heirlooms were issued a PB category weapon, however, post the 2008 Mumbai terrorist attack the Indian Government reformed its gun ownership norms. As a result, those civilians who are apprehended by â€œserious and imminent threatâ€ to their lives or those who reside in terrorist- prone areas, or even government officials who have made themselves targets in front of terrorists by nature of their job, or MLAs or MPs or of citizens associated with anti- terrorist programmes or their family members.
Prior to 1987, the licenses were granted by the appropriate authority of the state government or a District Magistrate. But after 1987, the licenses granted for PB became entirely the duty of the central government.
The Indian Government monopolises the sale, manufacturing, import, export of such firearms and ammunition and the Indian Ordnance Factory (headquartered in Kolkata) has the duty to manufacture and sell these arms and ammunition in India. The Indian Defence Ministry controls the Indian Ordnance factories across the nation.
Currently, the Indian firearm laws are easily one of the strictest in the world. In USA, obtaining any firearm is a constitutional right, however, in India, the same is just a privilege. No ordinary citizen of India can obtain a firearm without a valid license granted by the competent licensing authority. Moreover, the latest amended Arms Rules of 2016 has made the license mandatory even for airguns.
Getting a firearm in India is no childâ€™s play. The severe Indian laws on firearms have made it next to impossible for an ordinary citizen to possess a gun. Nonetheless, the entire process to obtain a firearm (gun) is prescribed under Chapter- III of the Arms Act, 1959.
Now, to obtain a self- defence license, the individual must prove impending threat to life. However, protection can be from wild animals as well.
The most popular weapon (gun) which is provided to those individuals who were eligible to possess arms under the law is the Double Barrelled Shotgun of 12 gauge also called the DBBL 12 Bore, other common weapons are 0.315 Bolt Action Rifle (which has a magazine capacity of 5 cartridges) and 0.32 Smith & Wesson Long Revolvers (with chamber capacity of 6 cartridges).
USA too has strict laws when it comes to obtaining a weapon for personal use which are found in a number of state as well as federal statutes. The American laws monitor everything from the manufacturing, sale, possession, import- export, record keeping, transportation, as well as destruction of weapons, ammunition, and accessories of the firearms.
These firearm laws are administered by state agencies and the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
In addition to Federal and State gun laws in USA several local authorities have their own firearms laws. The Second Amendment of the US constitution provides the right to keep and possess arms. The said Second Amendment to the US constitution was implemented to safeguard its own citizens against the possibility of repression, arising from within the government.
The firearms laws are more stringent in the UK than other European nations (firearms rules prescribed under the European Firearms Directive) and therefore, it is quite difficult to access a firearm in the UK since it is tightly controlled by law. Northern Ireland has less restricted laws which surprising makes it the country with the lowest rates of gun homicide in the world where there were only 0.05 recoded intentional committed homicides with a firearm with more than 100,000 citizens in the 5 years to 2011 (15 - 38 people per year). Gun homicides only accounted for 2.4% of all the homicides in the year 2011.
However, there is some anxiety over the easy accessibility of illegal procurement of firearms. The office of the National Statistics figures discloses that there in total 7,866 offences where firearms were involved by the end of March, 2015 which witnessed a 2% increase from the earlier year and the first increase in close to 10 years. Out of the total 7866, 19 were fatal injuries which was 10 lesser than the earlier year and the lowest since the time the records were first started getting maintained in 1969.
However, there was a gradual rise in offences to 8,399 by the end of March 2016 which was highest in 4 years, but notably lower than the all-time high of 24,094 in 2003- 04. Out of these 26 were fatal injuries.
The whole world witnessed the massacre that ended the lives of at least 50 people in a nightclub in Orlando, Florida in the USA. USA has a horrific history when it comes to witnessing such random shootouts. In fact, USA in the last 50 years, has witnessed similar shootouts more than twice an year where gunmen have killed 4 or more people with 12 such shootings in 2016 alone.
Now, even though there have been repeated requests by a lot of lawmakers to restrict easy availability of firearms licenses, but still the American firearms laws remain unusually free and easy.
The shooter in Orlando (Omar Mateen) had legally purchased the assault rifle that was used by him to execute the massacre. The Florida state of USA permits its citizens to possess concealed weapons after successfully undergoing a 28- hour gun training course. The shooter Omar Mateen had a valid license to possess the weapon which proves that he had successfully attended the training.
So when laws and restrictions are compared between India and USA, India by far has stricter laws and restrictions to obtain a gun legally, as a result, gun ownership is rare in India.
According to a recent Small Arms Survey, India ranks 110th in the world in terms of ownership of civilian firearm, with only 4.2 guns per 100 citizens. USA, on the other hand, ranks 1st, with 88.8 guns per 100 citizens. This proves that nations where restrictions to gun ownership are rare, civilian gun deaths are also rare.
As understood India has more stringent firearms laws than USA, however, the same is undermined by easy availability of weapons from illegal sources.
As per reports and recommendations, the Ministry of Home Affairs has now planned to maintain a National Database of Arms Licenses so as to have an official record of all the holders of arms licenses including both old and new holders.
All these weapon holders will further be furnished a Unique Identification Number. The following step has been taken as a pro-active step the be able to monitor and track authorised as well as unauthorised gun holders. This is a precautionary step to minimise crimes leading to loss of lives due to gunfire/ shootings by unauthorised guns/ weapons.
Keeping all of the above into consideration India has strict firearms law when it comes to issuance of gun licenses, however, India still has the 2nd most number of deaths due to guns which shows that the Arms Act has not entirely been able to make hindrance among the masses in India which is solely because of easy availability of illegal weapons that are smuggled into India through numerous different means.
#tags: Firearms in India, Firearms in USA, Firearms in UK, Guns in India